it’s not about tithing, but it is about the money…

Over the last few weeks, I’ve been tackling problems that don’t revolve around ethereal stuff like “new ideas,” “vision” and other theological talk that can lack consequence.  In fact, I’ve been so sucked into these challenges that I’ve begun to wonder whether discussing the church’s problems or their solutions really matters if the people in the discussion aren’t somehow personally and materially invested.  They, somehow, need to be givers or prepared to become givers to what we share.  A giver gives so much more than money.   But, they give money, too.  They give to something beyond themselves.

It’s not that discussing our feelings and perspectives on church isn’t  important.  But, if the people talking about the church are thousands of dollars in consumer debt or unable to substantively invest in community with their time or energy, I’m afraid airing our views – no matter how thought out and accurate – may hold only therapeutic value.   Don’t get me wrong!  Therapy is important.  But, like any other therapeutic or academic exercise, it revolves around perspectives on “the self.”  Therefore, it suffers, at some point, from the vacuum created when the self replaces shared discipleship or Christ’s call to prophetic community.  This is the vacuum slowly sucking the life out of denominationalism:  loss of a sense of shared community, shared discipline, shared practices, and shared convictions with substantial consequence.

I realize I may sound like I’m going either institutional or conservative.   But, I meant what I said in my previous post about following Jesus or saving the church.   I’m not talking about returning to some institutional position on tithing.   I’m not talking about a pay-to-play system in the church or instituting stringent requirements for Christian membership.   But, I am talking about the problem of “cheap church” and a loss of a basic sense of discipleship in community.  If our sense of faith and Christ’s community has become so separated from our relationship with our stuff, our time, our money, and energies, that we think belonging to Christ’s community is an entitlement or a service that should be provided by denominations or religious institutions, the Spirit of our movement is lost.

So, let’s talk about the money.  Why not?

We struggle on both sides.  In the church, we have many congregations that are deeply attached to their houses of worship.  75-90% of the time, those churches are paid for.   These buildings are the ebenesers, the alters, of a previous generation.  They are the hallmark of our denominationalism.   We are no longer a frontier movement.  We now have our church on the corner.  This was the success of previous generations.   Because of them, I would bet 75-90% of our congregations have no mortgage, only maintenance and monthly bills.   Five to fifty gather in them once a week.

Often, these same congregations have difficulty raising funds for missional ministries, hiring ministers, or community projects.   Also, paying for their area campgrounds are a drain.   Often these congregations have faithful givers.   Some have less money to offer and more time and skills.  Sometimes these loyal members get in the way of new life and spiritual direction.   But, sometimes these members are more than willing to see change.   The hurdle is that, after a lifetime of denominational loyalty, they do not know how to reach out, innovate, and add to the fold.   So, they maintain.  The history of decline takes its toll.   An increasing sense of need might pull downward on the congregation’s self-esteem.  In the worst case scenario, members become entrenched.  They start guarding against outsiders, usually “liberals,” denominational leaders who talk about “change,” or those “generic Christians” who might take away what’s left of our identity.  (I still don’t know what a generic Christian is, but I’ve heard church members be worried about them more than once.)  All awhile, money and time is where their mouth is – pouring into the things we think “we” need, for “us” – both on the congregational, mission center, and personal levels.

Outside the church, we also live in a day when the relationship between spirituality and economics is wholly out of whack.  Unbriddled greed and a world sold out to the god of wealth and wealth-production, has horribly contorted the relationship of our economic and spiritual needs.   All around, I see its effects in “liberal” and conservative forms.    Many Christians have literally sold out the doctrine of economic wealth and prosperity:  we can spend ourselves out of crises, whether spiritual or economic.  This not only makes absolutely no sense, wealth and prosperity – no matter how American – are false gods.   They are not the good news, but a completely alien form of religion and spirituality.   Christian faith and the call to prophetic community operates on a different kind of sense.    Christ’s community is not based on getting what you pay for.  Nor, is its growth based on profits or consuming more.  The salvation of the church, on earth as it is in heaven, is based on what is given and what is shared:  the shared grace, disciplines, practices, vision, and shared convictions.  The church is a witness to community.

We don’t need a moralistic return to a 10% tithing to fix this.  In fact, everyone can tithe and still sell out to the economic gods.   We don’t need a denominational membership system to hold people accountable.   This would be the same old legalism.  We also don’t have to start giving guilt-ridden presentations about how much money it takes to heat the sanctuary or pay for copy toner.  That would be guilt-based politics.  However, if we’re going to get together and talk about who we are, who we follow, and what our shared salvation really means, we have to agree that Christ’s community costs us something.   And, we have consistently lift up what it promises.

Discipleship costs.  And, to some extent, it is about the money.  But, it’s not about the money so the church can have alot, or any.  It’s about the money because money is the god of the world we must face. We no longer live in a biblical world where land dictates wealth and the majority are subsistence farmers.  For many of us, our economic well-being is no longer tied directly to the earth’s fertility or patterns of rain or drought.  Instead, for the first time in human history, we suffer the “weather” of an almost wholly (not holy) (hu)man-made economy.   Our global economy is designed on the idea that human beings have insatiable appetites for things.  Selfhood, selfishness and self-interest can be paths to earthly salvation and human improvement.  This religion measures health on the flow of goods and happiness on levels of consumption.   It has its own doctrines and spirituality.   It requires that we spend and spend often in order for the god’s elect to reap their fruit: profit.  They hire us to help them do that, and we are glad that it also benefits us.

Praying for the “rain to come” and for the harvest to be plenty in our world means paying homage to this religion and god of profit.  There is little getting around it.   We have to charge, buy, mortgage, refinance, and spend.   The problem is that this god will also bankrupt us if it is the God we live by.   This god has many many victims.  If we do not put something sustainable and communal at the center of our work, life, and play, this god, alone, will have its way and its reign.  The best insurance against this kind of idolatry is Christian community, a community that shares and gives.   To find it, we must give a portion of what we have away.

That is why the church is such an important vessel for Good News, sanity, and sanctuary in our world.   Christ’s call to give was never about denominational tithing or supporting a clergy class.  But, it was about where our faith could be.  The discipline of giving, even just a little, puts us in a stronger position in a world that believes profits puts us in a stronger safer position.   It puts us in a stronger position against religious economic doctrines that tell us we can spend our way to spiritual happiness or economic wholeness.  This is not the faith or the doctrine of Christ’s church.  Discipleship is not concerned with how much we earn or measuring our profit.  Nor, is it about salvation through gaining what can be had by spending.    But, it is about the money.

Christ owned no land, which meant he was broke.  He was an artisen, a blue collar carpeter, who never mortgaged a home.  He had no inheritance, but the inheritance of God’s kingdom.  Christ gave so that others could have and give.  Christ gave so that others would have something to take and share.  This was the miracle of his healings, his feeding of the 5000 and 4000, and the last supper.  It’s about the power and mystery of giving.

This the the open secret: the power and mystery of Christ’s giving.  Christ’s community is about this kind of sharing.  Giving and sharing makes community.  You don’t do one to make the other.  They happen simultaneously and it strengthens every time you repeat it.

In our world, a prophetic community must give and share.  And, it will always have more than a community that does not, that instead proclaims the good news of profit and blasts us with pictures of happy consumers who say “follow me.”    We cannot spend our way to financial health any more than we can borrow our way to a full life or spiritual wholeness.   The answer isn’t about denominational tithing or shopping for personal spirituality, but it is about the money.

Money will always be more than just credit, consumption, and profits.   Money always already has spiritual value, too.   It’s about the costs.  Expecting something from nothing makes no more sense economically than it does spiritually.   This is not faith.  Christ’s community is a divine gift, but it does not come from nothing.  Rather, it is a result of our stewardship and what we will share.   The church is a divine gift that can never be spiritually taken away.  However, it will always be what we make of it.   We are the church.   That is what takes faith.  Unlike the world, Christ’s economy is not based on getting what we pay for, wanting more, or making profits.  These things aren’t evil in and of themselves.   We just realize that after feeding of the 5000 (Matthew 14:16-26), Jesus “leftovers” were not his profit.  They were the abundance left over when the least of these, a boy with five loaves and two fishes, shared a little.


9 responses to “it’s not about tithing, but it is about the money…

  1. You rock my face…

    I often struggle in the past with feeling like I have to say “No” to God, either I have to work, or it will cost money. I can’t tell you how much relief it gives me to feel the presence of the Spirit as He teaches me to give in ways that He has gifted. I still struggle with wanting to do more, often times receiving the Holy answer of “wait”. But, I am still able to have a sense of success in giving more than monetary guilt. I, too, have been growing in an understanding of fiscal responsibility. I don’t need things, I need God. That dress in the window would look good on me, but I think I wear Jesus much better…

  2. Hi, Matt,

    This is a thought provoking post and I am no where near done thinking about it. So, I expect that I will have more to say. I thought I would start by sharing a few pieces of thinking that were prompted by what you said.
    First, we can’t confine spirituality or religion to the soul and forget about the material aspects of life as you point out in your post. Our church comes from a heritage that upholds all things as spiritual. Most people would agree that those who are starving need something to eat before they can concentrate on the insight of a sermon, for example. Money does matter and it is foolish to think that it doesn’t. Cal French, a former church appointee and pastor of the Washington DC congregation for a long time, said from time to time that a rich church member was more useful than a poor church member. I know that he did not mean this in terms of the worth of the person, but rather as an admission that doing good often takes money, and so the richer person (provided that he or she was willing to share that wealth with the church) brought more leverage to the church.
    But here is where things get ambivalent for me. I am with you when you state that community is vital, and that for the community to achieve its potential it must be generous both within its borders and across its borders. What trips me up is the notion that the church is synonymous with Christ’s community.
    I am involved in community–in fact it’s inescapable–whether or not I participate in church community. Through my family, friends, my work, professional associations, neighborhood, and all the other groups that involve me. These are all part of Christ’s community, as I see it. So, I think it is an over simplification to look at things as yes we are part of a community or no we are not part of a community. Instead, we need to view the modern man/woman/child as part of multiple communities. With the goal of each community to help the person maximize his or her own gifts/talents/ministry/response to the Spirit, and the purpose of each person to develop his or her potential and share it generously, according to the direction of the Spirit through his or her current or through new communities. I’m just speaking my opinion here, but that is what makes sense to me.
    What bothers me about church is that I often feel like it pulls me away from community…or rather pulls me (my resources) to a specific community from another specific community. There has to be a reason for giving resources to a particular community as opposed to another community. In that comes a difficult balance, and one that I think depends on the individual and how he or she is called by God. For example, I can’t invest the same amount of time in all the communities and still do what I need to do effectively. At the same time, there are some communities that offer something to me, or that I can offer something through more effectively than other communities. So, I have to take this into account as I make decisions.

    Anyway, I will leave it at that for the moment and look forward to more discussion.

  3. I hear you brother! I don’t know how well you knew my dad, but I was learning this at his knee from a very early age. He had such a powerful testimony of the joy he felt in being a good steward. Giving to the Lord (the church) was a joyful duty! Stewardship was his favorite subject to preach about, and I have several friends who still vividly recall a sermon he gave on the subject, where he opened a briefcase and out spilled 46 tithing books – one for each year of their marriage (to that point). As a teacher, he never made a lot of money – that wasn’t his priority in life. The most ironic thing is that he was also a college business professor. He taught about capitalism, business, investments, etc. And yet in his own life he worshiped only God. Never money, property, possessions… He found his joy in being able to support his family and his church, not in amassing wealth or power (or debt). The only debt he EVER had was the mortgage…

    So he was a wonderful role model. Sadly, I haven’t done nearly as well at instilling these values in my own children.

  4. People pay for product. Period. Should we pay for the product of having a warm/cool space to come each Sunday to worship? Sure. But people who sometimes think this is a chore (the young) or somehow they are doing the church (or their parents) a favor by showing up, don’t see themselves getting any benefit.

    In my congregation, we never have any problem raising money for a new sound system, new parking lot, new paint – people see these products and want to help. Similarly, World Church initiatives – like the Chattanooga dealy and Tsunami relief – tend to meet even challenging goals, because people like to see what they pay for. Regular payments that go off to who-knows-where to support “mission” are more difficult products for people to understand.

    The emphasis the WC has placed on defining what that mission is, articles in the Herald, weekly offering readings, have been good at helping people see this, but the Church needs to do more. The same people who can’t find $10 a month for tithing, easily pay for HBO, cell phones, i-tunes, etc. The problem is not a lack of money. I also don’t think it’s a lack of calling. Its the inability of the church to show them that what they give is getting them a product they want.

  5. As one of the 70’s 80’s and 90’s group who are presently supporting the church, I see the need for the younger generation to develop some self discipline and step up to the plate…if they want the church to survive.

    Personally, unless something changes, I think this is the last generation
    of this church. We will soon die off and I don’t see the younger generation understanding much about our mission. They would rather be entertained.

    There’s more to church then entertainment. That’s the place where we join the team that wants to help change our communities into ideal communities. But the younger generation…no, they want all the latest toys and they don’t care if the church dies. It doesn’t entertain them enough. They’d rather go to a concert…or better yet attend some church that specializes in “entertainment church”.

    Unfortunately, they will get their wish if they don’t step up and start paying their way. Yes, the church is about money. Whether you agree with the “mission” of “the church” or not. Local congregations are busy working toward building better communities. That is if the World Church doesn’t sell off our buildings to finance “their” mission.

    • As a 20-something year old high priest who has been a pastor, led retreats, and been involved in various ways in official church activities, I do understand the perspective expressed by Margie regarding the lack of young adult or younger people’s involvement. However, I think it is a mistake to make such as sweeping generalization to equate lack of Community of Christ funding/involement by younger folks with lack of desire to grow in discipleship and provide ministry.

  6. I do not think the Herald represented your article accuratly. when I read the sentence ” Wealth and prosperity are false gods” I was offended and riled to say the least. The sentence should have been “wealth and prosperity are false gods to many” . I happen to be wealthy and prosperous, and they are not my gods. I am wealthy and prosperous because of God. I give because I recieved of God in faith and I recieve because I give to God in faith. After going to your website and reading the entire article , I understood the message you were conveying. I agree with what you said. I also believe money should be freely and cheerfully given and not forcefully taken

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s